Review Process

Progressus Humanitatis implements the following review process policies:

1. Manuscripts submitted by authors will undergo a review process by the editor, specifically checking the manuscript's suitability for the journal's scope and its compliance with the journal's template. During this process, the editor will communicate with the author to determine whether the manuscript is suitable for submission to review or even returned/declined.
2. Manuscripts that have passed step 1 above will be sent to two reviewers for content review using a blind peer review method.
3. As a tool to maintain plagiarism levels within journal requirements, Progressus Humanitatis Insentif uses iThenticate software.
4. The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
5. Reviewers will suggest improvements and/or accept/reject the article.
6. The editor will decide, taking into account the reviewers' suggestions, whether the manuscript meets Progressus Humanitatis's requirements.
7. The editor's decision is final.